| title | Does Scaling Toward AGI Depend on What System-1 Lets System-2 Execute? |
|---|---|
| authors | Qi Wang, Yun Qu, Lizhou Cai, Heming Zou, Haoang Chi, Yiqin Lv, Xiang Li, Haiyan Feng, Mengyu Ge, Yize Geng, Yuhang Jiang, Yixiu Mao, Xiangyang Ji |
| date | 2026-10-29 |
| venue | arXiv (preprint, not peer reviewed) |
| id | arXiv:2610.39497 |
| affiliation | Tsinghua University |
| upvotes | 53 (Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-11-03) |
| links | abs pdf hf |
| abstract | Progress toward artificial general intelligence (AGI) has largely relied on scaling a resource-intensive executive, System-2, through larger models, more data and compute, longer reasoning, and more agents. We ask whether the next stage may come instead from co-designing it with System-1, a lightweight, semantically aware predictor that evaluates candidate interactions before execution, so that System-2 acts only on those worth their cost. Our answer is a qualified yes. We study conditional interaction, a predict--gate--execute--update loop: System-1 estimates each candidate's utility, System-2 executes those admitted by an adaptive threshold, and the outcomes update System-1. The loop spans training, test-time reasoning, adaptive decision-making, and agentic tool use, with utility and cost defined by the application. Under ideal screening and equal execution costs, execution compute falls by a factor approaching 1/ρ_u, where ρ_u is the density of utility-relevant interactions (cost-weighted when costs differ); prediction errors, exploration, and distribution shift reduce the saving. We bound selection regret by predictor error and the utility margin. These results motivate our central hypothesis: ρ_u is a measurable coordinate of scaling efficiency and makes informative compute a better description of scaling than total compute. |
cite
@misc{wang2026does,
title={Does Scaling Toward AGI Depend on What System-1 Lets System-2 Execute?},
author={Qi Wang and Yun Qu and Lizhou Cai and Heming Zou and Haoang Chi and Yiqin Lv and Xiang Li and Haiyan Feng and Mengyu Ge and Yize Geng and Yuhang Jiang and Yixiu Mao and Xiangyang Ji},
year={2026},
eprint={2610.39497},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39497}
}