| title | More Choices, Fewer Decisions: Ordinal-Scale Bias in JEV-like Direct-Decision Models |
|---|---|
| authors | Tianxiang Gao, Jinzhe Li, Zhiyuan Li, Yi Chang, Yuan Wu |
| date | 2026-09-30 |
| venue | arXiv (preprint, not peer reviewed) |
| id | arXiv:2609.38827 |
| affiliation | Jilin University |
| upvotes | 46 (Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-11-01) |
| links | abs pdf hf code |
| abstract | Direct-decision models turn text into low-latency structured labels and scores, making them attractive for classification and automatic evaluation. Yet reliability requires more than accuracy: a model must also use the ordinal decision scale supplied by the user faithfully. We analyze JEV~1.13 and three open KEV models. Our investigation begins with ANLI, where JEV assigns 38.8\% of all predictions and 51.3\% of errors to Neutral despite 74.95\% accuracy, nearly balanced gold labels, and balanced candidate positions. Across 36 ordinal datasets, final decisions use only 67--76\% of the effective gold support, versus 87--102\% on four nominal tasks. Randomizing candidate order weakens but does not remove this compression. Holding items and source scores fixed while balancing gold support and positions, we refine scales from K=2 to 14; utilization falls for every model and reaches 26--75\% at K=14, although candidate probabilities remain broad for most models. Targeted BA-LoRA post-training raises gold-relative utilization from roughly 47\% to 86\% on eight supervised scales at both KEV sizes, showing that the compression is learned and modifiable rather than an immutable architectural limit. We call this ordinal scale-utilization bias: decision-stage candidate-space compression distinct from accuracy, gold imbalance, fixed position, and candidate count alone. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Glax147/jev_ordinal_scale_bia |
cite
@misc{gao2026more,
title={More Choices, Fewer Decisions: Ordinal-Scale Bias in JEV-like Direct-Decision Models},
author={Tianxiang Gao and Jinzhe Li and Zhiyuan Li and Yi Chang and Yuan Wu},
year={2026},
eprint={2609.38827},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38827}
}