| title | Verify Before You Distill: Prompt-Level Teacher Gating for On-Policy Distillation |
|---|---|
| authors | Zhiwei Zhang, Zechen Sun, Fei Zhao, Kang Peng, Bin Liang, Huayu Deng, Yao Hu, Kam-Fai Wong, Mu Chuan |
| date | 2026-09-02 |
| venue | arXiv (preprint, not peer reviewed) |
| id | arXiv:2609.02998 |
| affiliation | AllSpark Research |
| upvotes | 16 (Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-11-01) |
| links | abs pdf hf |
| abstract | On-policy distillation (OPD) accelerates post-training by providing dense token-level supervision from a frozen teacher on the student's own rollouts. Vanilla OPD applies this supervision uniformly across prompts, without checking whether the teacher is reliable for each prompt. Because reverse KL is mode-seeking, a confidently wrong teacher can induce a strong yet misleading update. Distributional proxies, such as entropy or teacher-student likelihood agreement, measure uncertainty or agreement but do not directly verify outcome correctness. We introduce Teacher-Gated On-Policy Distillation (TGOPD), built on the principle that teacher reliability should be verified at the prompt level before dense supervision is admitted. TGOPD estimates reliability from a small set of verifier-scored teacher probes and routes each prompt exclusively to dense OPD when the reliability check passes or to verifier-grounded GRPO otherwise. Across 4B and 35B students in mathematics, code, and instruction following, TGOPD outperforms Vanilla OPD in all six single-domain settings and achieves higher seven-benchmark averages at both scales under multi-domain training. By using otherwise-idle teacher capacity for reliability estimation, TGOPD also reduces teacher-side compute waste in asynchronous OPD, increasing teacher-node GPU utilization from 9.8% to 78.9% in the measured 4B single-domain run. |
cite
@misc{zhang2026verify,
title={Verify Before You Distill: Prompt-Level Teacher Gating for On-Policy Distillation},
author={Zhiwei Zhang and Zechen Sun and Fei Zhao and Kang Peng and Bin Liang and Huayu Deng and Yao Hu and Kam-Fai Wong and Mu Chuan},
year={2026},
eprint={2609.02998},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02998}
}