titleMMOOC: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Out-of-Context Evaluation in Multimodal Large Language Models
authorsWenjie Zhu, Yabin Zhang, Wenjun Zeng, Lei Zhang
date2026-08-01
venuearXiv (preprint, not peer reviewed)
idarXiv:2607.27637
affiliationVCLab
upvotes4 (Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-11-01)
linksabs pdf hf code
abstractMultimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved strong performance on a wide range of vision-language tasks, but often fail under imperfect or shifted contexts. A reliable MLLM should refuse truly out-of-context (OOC) questions with subject-level context shifts while still answering shifted in-context (Shifted IC) questions with non-subject context shifts. Existing benchmarks mainly target OOC or visually unanswerable questions, but overlook answerable Shifted IC cases and cover limited OOC shifts. To fill this gap, we present MMOOC, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating refusal and robust answering abilities of MLLMs. MMOOC contains over 41K image-question pairs, including answerable Shifted IC cases and unanswerable OOC cases, spanning three question formats, eight shift types and six visual scenarios, with data quality ensured through MLLM-based filtering and human verification. We evaluate model responses using Accuracy and Refusal Rate, and further introduce an LLM-as-a-Judge metric to assess the correctness of model reasoning. Experiments on diverse MLLMs show that current models still struggle to balance answer-ability and refusal under shifted contexts. We further analyze key failure patterns and show that post-training can improve robustness. MMOOC will be made publicly available.

cite

@misc{zhu2026mmooc,
  title={MMOOC: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Out-of-Context Evaluation in Multimodal Large Language Models},
  author={Wenjie Zhu and Yabin Zhang and Wenjun Zeng and Lei Zhang},
  year={2026},
  eprint={2607.27637},
  archivePrefix={arXiv},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27637}
}