titleDiscretizing Reward Models
authorsVijay Viswanathan, Shiqi Wang, Devamanyu Hazarika, Chirag Nagpal, Tongshuang Wu, Graham Neubig, Yuning Mao
date2026-06-19
venuearXiv (preprint, not peer reviewed)
idarXiv:2606.21795
affiliationAI at Meta
upvotes16 (Hugging Face Daily Papers, 2026-11-01)
linksabs pdf hf
abstractDespite their widespread use, the role of reward models in shaping reinforcement learning is poorly understood. Reward models offer a tempting promise: they automatically estimate response quality in the absence of verifiers or human judges. Unlike "verifiable rewards" which typically produce binary scores, reward models typically produce continuous scores, allowing them to be sensitive to fine-grained differences in responses. However, we show this apparent strength is a serious weakness: many popular reward models are oversensitive, assigning different scores to equally good responses. Theoretically, we show that seemingly perfect reward models can be highly oversensitive; empirically, this oversensitivity can lead to bad policies. In place of existing notions of "reward model accuracy," we propose evaluating reward models using distinct measures of "discriminative ability" and "specificity" (the complement of oversensitivity). As a solution, we describe a training-free algorithm that uses Monte Carlo dropout on any neural reward model to produce discrete reward clusters. Theoretically, we prove there exist discretizations that reduce oversensitivity at minimal expense of discriminative ability; empirically we show, in both controlled and natural RL settings, that discretizing rewards leads to less reward hacking and better policies than training on the original rewards.

cite

@misc{viswanathan2026discretizing,
  title={Discretizing Reward Models},
  author={Vijay Viswanathan and Shiqi Wang and Devamanyu Hazarika and Chirag Nagpal and Tongshuang Wu and Graham Neubig and Yuning Mao},
  year={2026},
  eprint={2606.21795},
  archivePrefix={arXiv},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21795}
}